The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Nazire Nurdan Cakir
dc.contributor.authorDemirbuğa, Sezer
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T17:18:44Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T17:18:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractObjective The purpose of this double-blind and split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical success of the placement technique (bulk-filling and incremental techniques) of a bulk-fill resin composite in Class II carious lesions. Materials and methods Two different bulk-fill resin composites, X-tra fil (Voco) and Filtek Bulk Fill (3M ESPE), were used in the bulk-filling and incremental techniques for 20 patients. The study was carried out in 4 groups, with 20 restorations in each group. Restorations were appraised at baseline, 6-month, 2-year, and 4-year recall. World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used in the evaluations. The Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results At the end of year 4, there was no loss of restoration in any group. According to the USPHS and FDI criteria, there was a difference in the baseline and 4-year in marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration of the restorations (P < 0.05). When Filtek-Bulk was placed as an incremental technique, there was a minor fracture in four restorations (P > 0.05). In addition, Filtek-Bulk showed a color change according to the results based on both the USPHS and FDI criteria (P < 0.05). The difference between the two placement techniques of each resin composite was not significant at the year 4 recall when all criteria were evaluated (P (>) 0.05). Conclusions The 4-year clinical success of the evaluated bulk-fill composites is not dependent on the placement technique used.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-022-04749-7
dc.identifier.endpage557
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid36222961
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139704213
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage541
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04749-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14440/834
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000866375200002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250201
dc.subjectBulk-fill resin composite
dc.subjectIncremental technique
dc.subjectBulk technique
dc.subjectResin composite
dc.subjectFDI
dc.subjectUSPHS
dc.titleThe influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu