Determination of Malnutrition Risk in Paediatrics Patients With Two Screening Tools: Is Pyms or Strongkids Effective?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaşmısırlı, Eda
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Habibe
dc.contributor.authorSoylu, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorİnanç, Neriman
dc.contributor.authorKendirci, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T17:18:29Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T17:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFakülteler, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü
dc.description.abstractAim: Early diagnosis of malnutrition is important in hospitalized children. Since the effectiveness of screening tools is still unclear, this study was conducted to assess the risk of malnutrition with PYMS and STRONGkids in inpatients children and to compare them with their anthropometric measurements. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the risk of malnutrition was determined by PYMS and STRONGkids in 222 patients aged from 1 to 16 years old. Results: According to the BMI values of the patients, 84.7% were normal and 15.3% were acute malnourished. Severe and moderate stunting was detected 8.1% and 11.3% of chronic malnourished patients respectively. In the patients without acute malnutrition, the low malnutrition risk was found 55.0% of the patients with PYMS whereas 42.9% with STRONGkids. The detection rate of the moderate risk with STRONGkids (47.1%) was higher than those PYMS (22.2%). The detection rate of high malnutrition risk with PYMS (22.8%) was higher than those STRONGkids (10.1%). In the patients with acute malnutrition, PYMS could not detect low and moderate malnutrition risk. The detection rates with STRONGkids were 6.1% for low and 36.4% for moderate risk. STRONGkids??? ability to detect patients with high malnutrition risk was lower (58.3%) than that of PMYS (100%). Significant changes were determined between the patients with low, moderate and high malnutrition risk regarding anthropometric measurements by STRONGkids (p<0.001). Conclusions: According to anthropometric measurements, PYMS was superior for detecting acute malnutrition while STRONGkids was superior for detecting chronic malnutrition.
dc.identifier.doi10.23751/pn.v24i2.10013
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139010195
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v24i2.10013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14440/694
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000822696600007
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMattioli 1885
dc.relation.ispartofProgress in Nutrition
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250201
dc.subjectanthropometry
dc.subjectmalnutrition risk
dc.subjectPYMS
dc.subjectSTRONGkids
dc.subjectscreening Tools
dc.titleDetermination of Malnutrition Risk in Paediatrics Patients With Two Screening Tools: Is Pyms or Strongkids Effective?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu