Impact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridERTURK AVUNDUK, AYSE TUGBA/0000-0002-7879-8150
dc.authoridDelikan, Ebru/0000-0003-1624-3392
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Sevim Atilan
dc.contributor.authorAvunduk, Ayse Tugba Erturk
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, Özcan
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Nazire Nurdan Cakir
dc.contributor.authorDelikan, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T17:18:55Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T17:18:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentNuh Naci Yazgan
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of light-cured and self-cured adhesives on enamel surfaces selectively etched with Er, Cr: YSGG laser or 35% phosphoric acid. A total of 60 class V cavities were prepared 1 mm above the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1: Clearfil SE Bond with no conditioning, Group 2: Tokuyama Universal Bond with no conditioning, Group 3: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 4: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 5: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and Group 6: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Microleakage was evaluated qualitatively (visually) and quantitatively (ImageJ). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23 and submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. In all evaluation methods, the microleakage scores exhibit significant differences (p*<0.001). Group 1 and Group 3 exhibited similar and lower microleakage values than the Group 5. In the occlusal margin, the microleakage values were similar in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 6, whereas in the gingival margin Group 4 showed significantly lower leakage compared to Group 2. Regardless of the etching protocols and adhesive systems used, less microleakage was observed on the occlusal surface than on the gingival surface. Phosphoric acid etching provides better results than laser etching for enamel surface treatment on both occlusal and gingival surfaces.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK)
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK). No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-024-04120-0
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.issn1435-604X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid39008166
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85198523986
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04120-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14440/911
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001272554700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofLasers in Medical Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250201
dc.subjectAdhesive systems
dc.subjectEr,Cr: YSGG laser
dc.subjectMicroleakage
dc.subjectSelective etching
dc.titleImpact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu