Comparison of skeletal and dental effects of two different tooth-tissue-borne types of rapid maxillary expansion appliances: A CBCT retrospective study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridDANISMAN, HIKMETNUR/0000-0002-4203-2575
dc.authoridGenc, Esra/0000-0002-0471-5236
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDanisman, Hikmetnur
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Esra
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, S. Kutalmia
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T17:18:48Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T17:18:48Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNuh Naci Yazgan
dc.description.abstractObjectives To compare the skeletal and dental effects of different types of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliances using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials/Methods This multi-centre study was conducted with a total of 56 patients. The sample consisted of two groups including the McNamara-Type RME (MNR) group with 30 patients (16 females, 14 males, mean age: 13.38 +/- 1.16 years) and Full-Coverage RME (FCR) group with 26 patients (10 females, 16 males, mean age:13.78 +/- 1.06 years). Twenty-one parameters were measured on CBCT images including 4 maxillary skeletal, 12 maxillary alveolar, and 5 maxillary dental measurements, and the data were analysed using the SPSS 20.0 software. Results The rates of increase in the palatal maxillary width (PMW) (3), PMW(4), and PMW(6) were significantly higher in the MNR group (P < .05). While the rates of increase in the buccal maxillary width (BMW) (3) and BMW(4) were statistically higher in the MNR group, the rate of increase in BMW (6) was higher in the FCR group (P < .05). The increases in HPW (4), HPW (6), PAA4(degrees), and PAA6(degrees), which are parameters about hard palate width (HPW) and palatal alveolar angle (PAA), were also significantly higher in the MNR group (P < .05). The increases in PAW (4) and PAW (6), referring to the widths between the palatal root apices were significantly higher in the MNR group (P < .05).The increase in Slope-6(degrees) was also higher in the MNR group (P < .05). Conclusion Expansion in the palatal region on the alveolar level was higher in MNR than in FCR, while expansion in FCR was the highest in the posterior. In both appliances, there was tipping in the buccal direction in both alveolar bone and teeth, and the rate of this tipping was higher in MNR.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12593
dc.identifier.endpage131
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid35699362
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132988161
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage123
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12593
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14440/865
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000818029200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250201
dc.subjectCBCT
dc.subjectdentoskeletal
dc.subjectmaxillary width
dc.subjectRME
dc.subjecttooth-tissue-borne
dc.titleComparison of skeletal and dental effects of two different tooth-tissue-borne types of rapid maxillary expansion appliances: A CBCT retrospective study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu