Besceli, BurakGüçlü, Mehmet MuratPolat, EfecanDevellioğlu, TimurhanMoğol, TahaKüçükusta, Nuh MehmetTanrıkulu, Enver Faruk2025-02-242025-02-2420212548-13042548-130410.53070/bbd.990807https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14440/255In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.trinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessunderwater acoustic communicationschannel equalizationunderwater acoustic channelSC-UWACMC-UWACunderwater acoustic communicationschannel equalizationunderwater acoustic channelSC-UWACMC-UWACArticle34Special27IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium